![]() I am hoping someone will make a worthy successor to Classic.Boxcryptor has been designed in such a way that Boxcryptor continues to work even if the Boxcryptor servers are not available and you're still signed into Boxcryptor. I use Classic on 3 different Win10 machines and it works perfectly fine. Not to mention what could happen if they get hacked. We have to enter our password to log in, and thus it is not as safe as a fully offline method. ![]() I don't care if the key they store is already encrypted with our password. If they dropped the bullshit about storing our keys (for our own good) and let us manage getting our keys to our mobile devices on our own, I would subscribe to it. I think they charge twice as much as they should for personal accounts. I don't mind the subscription so much as the online shit. They discontinued it (probably because they wanted more money) and went to the subscription service PLUS online. You are just limited in the number of 'mounts' you can have. No online component to your account at all. This is exactly what you are looking for. You may be able to find Boxcryptor Classic. free is always preferred, but not mandatory containers may be of choice but are not preferred what software can be used instead to let me work on files locally but at the time encrypting and syncing them to the cloud (dropbox)? Tl dr I don't like the idea of boxcryptor checking online for my credentials. What could be some alternatives to this? containers may be of choice but are not preferred, free is always preferred but not mandatory I would really prefer not to having to be online for this (I know I need to be online for the files to sync anyway). but what I don't appreciate is that it needs to be online to check for my credentials/plan. So boxcryptor seems to do the job just fine and although it is a container. Cryptomator is also not the most handy, although it could have some advantages like creating much smaller volumes and actually making them split into multiple, smaller, parts when encrypted. I kind of struggle with the idea of having a container somewhere that has to be mounted locally and uploaded to the cloud as a single file (with exceptions of using other softwares to split files e.g. I think I found the best practice in my case that is to use boxcryptor, that allows me to use files in my local disk all at the same time that it encrypts and syncs to my dropbox account. I have been recently reading a lot about encryption, how and what many here use it. Just make sure to tag the post with the flair and give a little background info/context. On Fridays we'll allow posts that don't normally fit in the usual data-hoarding theme, including posts that would usually be removed by rule 4: “No memes or 'look at this '” We are not your personal archival army.No unapproved sale threads, advertisement posts, or giveaways.No memes or 'look at this old storage medium/ connection speed/purchase' (except on Free Post Fridays).Search the Internet, this subreddit and our wiki before posting.And we're trying really hard not to forget.ģ.3v Pin Reset Directions :D / Alt Imgur link Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Timetm). government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data - legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |